Prediction of John Mccurdy vs Cassio Motta Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Mccurdy vs C. Motta

John Mccurdy

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Right-Handed

Cassio Motta

BRA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Mccurdy 1 - 0 Motta

They have played 4 sets in total, with John Mccurdy winning 3 and Cassio Motta winning 1. The last match between John Mccurdy and Cassio Motta was at the Wimbledon, 20-06-1983, Round: R3, Surface: Grass, with John Mccurdy getting the victory 6-0 6-4 3-6 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Mccurdy	1
Motta	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) Wimbledon(06-20-83)

Stats

John Mccurdy

Cassio Motta

J. Mccurdy vs C. Motta H2H Profile

J. Mccurdy	Stats	C. Motta
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
34.69% (17-32)	Career Total W/L	49.54% (216-220)
1	Grass	0
0	Titles	4
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

J. Mccurdy vs C. Motta Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), John Mccurdy has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Cassio Motta has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show John Mccurdy, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cassio Motta has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: John Mccurdy has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cassio Motta has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year John Mccurdy has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Cassio Motta winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: John Mccurdy has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 47% (W/L 8/9), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 27% (W/L 4/11). Cassio Motta has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 47% (W/L 2/0), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
Player level: In the last year, John Mccurdy has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Cassio Motta has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with John Mccurdy winning 1 times and Cassio Motta being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with John Mccurdy winning 3 and Cassio Motta winning 1.
The last match between John Mccurdy and Cassio Motta was at the Wimbledon, 20-06-1983, Round: R3, Surface: Grass, with John Mccurdy getting the victory 6-0 6-4 3-6 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, John Mccurdy has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Cassio Motta has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, John Mccurdy has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cassio Motta has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, John Mccurdy has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cassio Motta has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

John Mccurdy vs Cassio Motta Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Mccurdy vs C. Motta H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. Mccurdy	Stats	C. Motta
1	H2H Matches Won	0
3	Sets Won	1
21	Games Won	11
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑5 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

J. Mccurdy Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Cleveland - 06-08-1984
R3 Jeff KlapardaJ. Klaparda	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
Kitzbuhel - 23-07-1984
R2 Ivan KleyI. Kley	L	3-6 6-1 6-2	Stats
Neunkirchen CH - 09-07-1984
R2 Carlos CastellanC. Castellan	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Travemunde CH - 02-07-1984
R3 Jon LevineJ. Levine	L	6-0 6-1	Stats
Sydney Outdoor - 12-12-1983
R2 Marcel FreemanM. Freeman	L	6-3 6-3	Stats

View All

C. Motta Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Sao Paulo - 01-11-1993
R1 Younes El AynaouiY. El	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
Sao Paulo - 09-11-1992
R1 Carsten ArriensC. Arriens	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
Buzios - 02-11-1992
R2 Chuck AdamsC. Adams	W	6-3 6-4	Stats
SF Luis-Enrique HerreraL. Herrera	L	7-6(5) 6-4	Stats
R1 Guillermo Perez-RoldanG. Perez-Roldan	W	3-0 ret.	Stats

View All

J. Mccurdy vs C. Motta Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. Mccurdy	Stats	C. Motta
34.69% (17/32)	YTD Win/Loss	49.54% (216/220)
37.70% (46/76)	Sets Win/Loss	49.47% (556/568)
45.07% (526/641)	Games Win/Loss	49.72% (5188/5246)
26.67% (4/11)	Hard Win/Loss	52.10% (62/57)
35.71% (5/9)	Clay Win/Loss	49.43% (131/134)
0.00% (0/3)	Indoor Hard W/L	43.33% (13/17)
47.06% (8/9)	Grass Win/Loss	40.00% (8/12)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
595.47	Average Opponent Rank	397.25
55.56% (5/4)	Slam W/L	36.36% (16/28)
0.00% (0/2)	Masters W/L	24.00% (6/19)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	46.43% (13/15)
8.33% (1/11)	Main Tour W/L	41.50% (83/117)
42.31% (11/15)	Challenger W/L	70.50% (98/41)
29% (12/41)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	51% (184/361)
63% (5/8)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	39% (27/69)
0% (0/0)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	50% (3/6)
50% (6/12)	Deciding Set Win %	49% (74/151)
88% (17/15)	1st Set Won, Won Match	78% (214/167)
12% (17/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	21% (214/46)
6% (32/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	21% (219/46)